Thursday, January 6, 2011

Huckleberry Finn Getting A Makeover, Removing The N-Word And "Injun" From The Text. Political Correctness At Work Again


Ridiculous. Removing the N-Word and "Injun" from the "Huck Finn" books. The N-Word IS WRONG, I HATE IT, hate hearing people using it in songs, passing or when some people in the clubs are talking to their friends. Similar way some girls call themselves "Bitches" to on another, it's stupid. This novel was written at a time of slavery - that time period Mark Twain was alive and he actually hated American racism.

"Injun" is a term describing ..."Indians". They are actually Native Americans but because Columbus thought he landed in the Indies, he called the natives "Indians". It's not politically incorrect, it's just INCORRECT.

Read history, learn from it. Re-writing it to censor and appease others or shed the kids of today from something that was written over 120 years is just stupid. There's nothing wrong with asking "Why?"

Another thing. If they are so worried about the N-Word being used 219 times in that book - "Huck Finn" - and replacing it with the term "Slave" (which is derogatory term in its own right), then they why aren't they censoring Rap music? They both fall under the 1st Amendment for Freedom of Speech. You listen to the Nas song "Be A N(bleep) Too", the N-Word is used every 4 seconds. You listen to that song 5 times in a row, you will hear the N-Word more times than what is written in "Huck Finn". Something wrong there. Think about it.

Plus the President even said that he has rappers like Nas and Jay-Z among other non Hip-Hop artists on his I-Pod and that his daughters who are 9 and 7 introduced him to Hip-Hop (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jun/25/barackobama.uselections2008).

So the President is OK with his daughters listening to rap and the uses of that racist word freely, along with other derogatory remarks towards anyone/group/gender, I wonder how he feels about the censorship of the Mark Twain book? This site (here) has it listed as one of the top 100 banned books in America.

Why are we re-writing preexisting history? Seriously, we are so caught up in sheltering people from previous mistakes and try using Political Correctness to fix it. Wrong.




Via Guardian UK: Alabama publisher says expurgation of more than 200 'hurtful epithets' will counter 'pre-emptive censorship' that has seen Mark Twain's classic dropped from curricula

A new US edition of Mark Twain's classic novel The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn is to be published with a notable language alteration: all instances of the offensive racial term "nigger" are to be expunged.

The word occurs more than 200 times in Huckleberry Finn, first published in 1884, and its 1876 precursor, The Adventures of Tom Sawyer, which tell the story of the boys' adventures along the Mississippi river in the mid-19th century. In the new edition, the word will be replaced in each instance by "slave". The word "injun" will also be replaced in the text.

The new edition's Alabama-based publisher, NewSouth books, says the development is a "bold move compassionately advocated" by the book's editor, Twain scholar Dr Alan Gribben of Auburn University, Montgomery. It will have the effect, the publisher claims, of replacing "two hurtful epithets" in order to "counter the 'pre-emptive censorship' that Dr Gribben observes has caused these important works of literature to fall off curriculum lists worldwide."

Gribben said he had decided on the move because over decades of teaching Twain, and reading sections of the text aloud, he had found himself recoiling from uttering the racial slurs in the words of the young protagonists. "The n-word possessed, then as now, demeaning implications more vile than almost any insult that can be applied to other racial groups," he said. "As a result, with every passing decade this affront appears to gain rather than lose its impact."

"We may applaud Twain's ability as a prominent American literary realist to record the speech of a particular region during a specific historical era," Gribben added, "but abusive racial insults that bear distinct connotations of permanent inferiority nonetheless repulse modern-day readers."

Twain himself was a passionate critic of American racism, and donated money to a number of civil rights organizations including the nascent NAACP, as well as ironically critiquing prejudice in both Huckleberry Finn and the later novel Puddn'head Wilson. But controversy over his language is not new: The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn came in fifth on the American Library Association's list of the most "banned or challenged" books in the US in the 1990s (it had dropped in the 14th spot by the 2000s).

But the idea of changing the language in the novel in order to boost its popularity is still viewed with bafflement in many quarters. Dr Sarah Churchwell, senior lecturer in US literature and culture at the University of East Anglia, said the development made her "incandescent" with anger. "The fault lies with the teaching, not the book. You can't say 'I'll change Dickens so it is compatible with my teaching method'. Twain's books are not just literary documents but historical documents, and that word is totemic because it encodes all of the violence of slavery. The point of the book is that Huckleberry Finn starts out racist in a racist society, and stops being racist and leaves that society. These changes mean the book ceases to show the moral development of his character. They have no merit and are misleading to readers. The whole point of literature is to expose us to different ideas and different eras, and they won't always be nice and benign. It's dumbing down."

Geff Barton, head of King Edward's School in Bury St Edmunds, described the idea of changing Twain's language as "slightly crackpot". "It seems depressing that we are so squeamish that we can't credit youngsters with seeing the context for texts. Are we going to teach a sanitized version of The Merchant of Venice? What I would want to do is to explore issues of how language changes in context and culture," he said. Barton added that if Twain was taught less in the UK now, it was because since the national curriculum was introduced in 1989, the emphasis in English teaching was largely on works from the English literary canon rather than from America. "While we still teach To Kill a Mockingbird and Of Mice and Men, Twain might just have fallen under the radar," he said.|

No comments: